<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rick Nunn &#187; Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ricknunn.com/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ricknunn.com</link>
	<description>Graphic Designer/Photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:06:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fifty of Fifty — 2010</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/fifty-of-fifty-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/fifty-of-fifty-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I completed my second Project 50. For those that don't know Project 50 consists of 50 photos over 50 sequential days taken with a 50mm lens. That's a lot of 50s, right? So yeah, started on the 1<sup>st</sup> of July &#038; fifty days later I was done! A lot of you know that last year I did a photo a day for a year (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/sets/72157612070535384/">See the set on flickr</a>) you would think that fifty photos in a row must be a walk in the park. Well that would be true if I had approached it in the same way I did my 365 but for this project I wanted to keep the quality really high the whole way through.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday I completed my second Project 50. For those that don&#8217;t know Project 50 consists of 50 photos over 50 sequential days taken with a 50mm lens. That&#8217;s a lot of 50s, right? So yeah, started on the 1<sup>st</sup> of July &#038; fifty days later I was done! A lot of you know that last year I did a photo a day for a year (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/sets/72157612070535384/">See the set on flickr</a>) you would think that fifty photos in a row must be a walk in the park. Well that would be true if I had approached it in the same way I did my 365 but for this project I wanted to keep the quality really high the whole way through.</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4832428512/" title="50 Days, 50 Photos, 50mm by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4104/4832428512_6a4fd93fdf.jpg" width="500" height="360" alt="50 Days, 50 Photos, 50mm" /></a>
</p>
<p>I get asked a lot — <em>“What makes you want to do this?”</em> or <em>&#8220;Why would you do this if you aren&#8217;t getting paid for it?&#8221;</em>, generally my answer is — “Just for the sake of it” but let me expand on that a little more. To me the value of this project is completely inherent in the act of doing it or, more importantly, the act of completing it to a level of quality with which I am happy — I did it to prove to myself that I could.</p>
<p>I decided from the start I wanted to really make these shots stand out as a series; I wanted to give them all something that tied them together. I love film, &amp; the idea that a single frame can really tell a story so I thought I&#8217;d try to achieve that cinematic feel with well thought out composition &amp; post processing. Also, being a designer with a passion for well set type I wanted to add a typographical twist to the shots — hopefully carry on the story telling a little bit.</p>
<p class="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4772135413/" title="Life is Like Riding a Bicycle by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4082/4772135413_54f3dd2534_t.jpg" alt="Life is Like Riding a Bicycle" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4850601451/" title="I'm Not Sorry by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/4850601451_b03cf83e0b_t.jpg" alt="I'm Not Sorry" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4816490462/" title="If Flowers Could Talk by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4079/4816490462_39f884b70c_t.jpg" alt="If Flowers Could Talk" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4872915285/" title="Left For Dead by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4138/4872915285_5a195d649d_t.jpg" width="100" height="72" alt="Left For Dead" /></a></p>
<p>I approached this project as I would anything else in my life — diagonally. I scribbled down any ideas I had for photos into a Moleskine diary, along with any events, words, people, anything I could think of that might help. Laying it out like this made it a lot easier to get a clear picture of the whole project in my head. I could see the days where I was going to need to do a bit of extra organisation or need to ask a friend for help.</p>
<p class="center"><a href="http://www.ricknunnoftheinternet.com/post/890532536/ideas"><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/fiftyoffifty2010/moleskine.jpg"></a></p>
<p>I also wanted to make an effort to document the more interesting setups in the series. Every photo that used off camera lighting has strobist info in the description &#038; I started adding setup photos, which a lot of you will know I already add to quite a few of my prior photos. I also did about thirteen setup videos, a new thing for me; my iPhone 4 made producing them pretty easy &#038; the quality was good. You can check out all the videos on my <a href="http://vimeo.com/ricknunn">Vimeo</a> page.</p>
<p class="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4905363729/" title="Come Play With Us by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4095/4905363729_21344324a7_t.jpg" width="100" height="72" alt="Come Play With Us" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4902160867/" title="Act Like You Are Wearing A Cape by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4079/4902160867_461fcaf525_t.jpg" width="100" height="72" alt="Act Like You Are Wearing A Cape" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4866770301/" title="Sucks To Be Home by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4115/4866770301_9fdb5f5322_t.jpg" width="100" height="72" alt="Sucks To Be Home" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4886202561/" title="It's Hard To See Your Way Out by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4120/4886202561_10e8faedba_t.jpg" width="100" height="72" alt="It's Hard To See Your Way Out" /></a></p>
<p>I always suck at summing up projects; I really struggle to step back &#038; look at the project objectively to assess what I&#8217;ve achieved. I am <em>probably</em> overly self critical &#038; I rarely like anything I produce for more than 2 hours after I&#8217;ve done it. I guess that&#8217;s got something to do with why I put together some statistics. I know that most of them are meaningless, especially Explore, but it makes my creativity &#038; skill level quantifiable; my mind likes that. </p>
<p class="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4908860550/" title="Fifty of Fifty by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4143/4908860550_2672f3a7d9.jpg" width="500" height="360" alt="Fifty of Fifty" /></a></p>
<p>Regardless of how I feel I have done, I enjoyed the project a lot. I put more pressure on myself this time than in previous photographic challenges &#038; I think I responded well — I only thought about killing myself a few times.  So I guess in that respect the project is a massive success? Yeah… cool. </p>
<h3>Statistics</h3>
<p>As I said above, in some bizarre way, statistics help me quantify my ability as a creator of photographic images. Not on a personal &#8220;Do I like this image?&#8221; kinda level but more on a global &#8220;How well has this image gone down&#8221; sorta thing. I put together loads of stats from this project &#038; thought I would share some of them. If you&#8217;re as geeky as me you might enjoy them. I wish I had time to make a more in depth info graphic, as theres tonnes of data! But hey, I&#8217;ve got a million other things I should be doing!</p>
<p><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/fiftyoffifty2010/totals.png"><br />
<img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/fiftyoffifty2010/time_camera.png"><br />
<img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/fiftyoffifty2010/explore_lights.png"><br />
<img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/fiftyoffifty2010/apertures.png"></p>
<h3>The Site — <a href="http://fiftyoffifty.co.uk">FiftyofFifty.co.uk</a></h3>
<p>I built this simple <a href="http://fiftyoffifty.co.uk">site</a> to showcase the project on it&#8217;s own platform. Flickr is great for people to follow &#038; interact with a project in real time but once it&#8217;s over, it&#8217;s very easy for a project to get buried. I built the site in HTML5 with some sexy CSS3 &#038; also added a really nice iPhone optimised interface for the iPhone, including high res retina display graphics. Oh &#038; if you add the site to your home screen you&#8217;ll see a rather sexy <a href="http://dribbble.com/shots/42575-Fifty">icon</a> that <a href="http://twitter.com/JohnONolan">John O&#8217;Nolan</a> designed for me, what a guy! </p>
<p><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/fiftyoffifty2010/fiftyoffifty_site.png"></p>
<h3>So What&#8217;s Next?</h3>
<p>What a good looking question, thanks for asking — but I&#8217;m not telling yet! I&#8217;ve got some stuff to catch up on that I put off to do this project, including the next <strong>&#8216;How I Shoot&#8217;</strong> post, but don&#8217;t worry, my <a href="http://flickr.com/ricknunn">flickr</a> will <strong>not</strong> be neglected. I have loads in my edit pile to get through &#038; I can never last long without taking a photo or two! But more to the point I have already started planning the next project… it&#8217;ll be something a little different but hopefully just as enjoyable as this has been for people. Stay tuned.</p>
<h1>The Giveaway!!</h1>
<p>Yep! I am giving away a full set of fifty 7&#8243; by 5&#8243; prints from the project to just one person! In fact they are the exact ones I used in my final photo! Cool huh? To be in with a chance of winning all you need to do is follow <a href="http://twitter.com/RickNunn">me</a>on twitter &#038; tweet:</p>
<p class="note">Read about @RickNunn&#8217;s Fifty of Fifty photo project &#038; you could win fifty beautiful prints &#8211; http://bit.ly/fiftyoffifty</p>
<p>The winner will be picked at random &#038; announced here on the 1st of September 2010.</p>
<p class="note"><strong>Competition now closed — the winner is… <a href="http://twitter.com/robbarrett/">Rob Barrett</a>!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/fifty-of-fifty-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strobist Startup Kit — Budget vs Premium</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/strobist-startup-kit/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/strobist-startup-kit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How I Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to get started with strobist photography it does not have to cost the earth. I've put together a list of budget kit with a direct comparison to their premium counter parts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to get started with strobist photography it does not have to cost the earth. I&#8217;ve put together a list of budget kit with a direct comparison to their premium counter parts. I have recently set <a href="http://flickr.com/johnonolan">John</a> &#038; <a href="http://flickr.com/kymellis">Kym</a> up with with exact set up listed on the left-hand-side for their first strobist adventures.</p>
<ul class="compare_lis">
<li>
<h2>Speedlight</h2>
<div class="product">
<h4>Yongnuo YN460 II</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/yn460.jpg"></p>
<p>These little flashes are amazing for the money! The Yongnuo products are actually really well made; not your typical Chinese product. With a guide number of 38 and power control down to 1/64th they have everything you need. However they don&#8217;t have an automatic mode (E-TTL) but you wouldn&#8217;t be able to use your flash on an auto mode when firing it with radio triggers. <a href="http://photography.shop.ebay.co.uk/?_from=R40&#038;_trksid=m570&#038;_nkw=YN460+II&#038;_sacat=625">You can buy them here</a>, <em>Make sure you get the YN460 II it&#8217;s much better than the YN460</em>.</p>
<h5>Price: £32.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="product">
<h4>430ex II/SB-600</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/430ex.jpg"></p>
<p>These are both great flashes, but will cost you over seven times more,  they have more features but none you <strong>really</strong> need. The automatic modes are nice when you are running the flash on the camera but you wont be able to use it when running the flash wirelessly. In fact you won&#8217;t be able to use any of the extra features of these flashes when firing them via remote. You can get the Canon 430ex <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-canon-speedlite-430ex-ii-flashgun/p1027434">here</a> and the Nikon SB-600 <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-nikon-sb-600-speedlight-flashgun/p13353">here</a></p>
<h5>Price: £230.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Light Stand</h2>
<div class="product">
<h4>Konig</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/konig.jpg"></p>
<p>A light stand is a light stand right? These aren&#8217;t heavy, come with their own bag, and have lasted me a year and counting. <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Quality-photographic-light-stand-studio-lighting-/170467992215?pt=UK_Photography_StudioEquipment_RL&#038;hash=item27b0af2297#ht_1286wt_1139">Grab yours here</a></p>
<h5>Price: £12.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="product">
<h4>Manfrotto Nano</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/nano.jpg"></p>
<p>The Nano stand is a really nice product, it&#8217;s quite a bit smaller when folded down due to it&#8217;s 5 section design and it&#8217;s just 930g in weight. <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-manfrotto-5001b-nano-stand/p1031134">Available here</a>.</p>
<h5>Price: £45.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Bracket</h2>
<div class="product">
<h4>eBay</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/cheap_bracket.jpg"></p>
<p>This is really flexible, it&#8217;s modular design gives it a transformer like ability to suit nearly every combination of flash, trigger &#038; modifier you could throw at it. And it does this pretty cool double lock thing on the light stand so you can move it around with out worrying about dropping it all. <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Flash-Umbrella-Bracket-Light-Stand-1-4-3-8-Type-D-/170438549281?cmd=ViewItem&#038;pt=UK_Photography_StudioEquipment_RL&#038;hash=item27aeeddf21#ht_1228wt_1074">Buy one</a>.</p>
<h5>Price: £13.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="product">
<h4>Manfrotto Lite Tite Swivel</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/manfrotto_bracket.jpg"></p>
<p>This seems to be the holy grail of light brackets, I haven&#8217;t seen one in person, but if Manfrotto&#8217;s other products is anything to go buy they will be very well made. <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-manfrotto-mn026-lite-tite-swivel-and-umbrella-adaptor/p1005217">Available here</a>.</p>
<h5>Price: £24.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Umbrella</h2>
<div class="product">
<h4>2in1 Umbrella</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/cheap_umbrella.jpg"></p>
<p>For a first modifier it&#8217;s probably a good idea to go for something flexible, this convertible umbrella will fill that role nicely. You can use it as a shoot through as well as a reflective white &#038; silver. Grab the eBay special <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/109cm-strobist-convertible-2in1-shoot-through-umbrella-/250640429863?cmd=ViewItem&#038;pt=UK_Photography_StudioEquipment_RL&#038;hash=item3a5b557327#ht_4149wt_1139">here</a>.</p>
<h5>Price: £20.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="product">
<h4>Lastolite 100cm Dual Duty</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/lastolite_umbrella.jpg"></p>
<p>This is exactly the same thing as the one on ebay special just with a brand name on it. The build quality may be slightly better but I can&#8217;t really see any other benefits here. <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-lastolite-100cm-dual-duty-umbrella-white-silver-black/p12396">Available here</a>.</p>
<h5>Price: £38.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Triggers</h2>
<div class="product">
<h4>RF-602s</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/rf602.jpg"></p>
<p>These are the best things I have bought in a long time! They are super reliable, have a great range &#038; the added benefit of being useable as a remote shutter release. They come in 2 flavours, Nikon &#038; Canon, so make sure you get the right ones for your camera. <a href="http://photography.shop.ebay.co.uk/i.html?_nkw=RF-602&#038;_sacat=625&#038;_odkw=RF-602&#038;_osacat=0&#038;bkBtn=&#038;_trksid=p3286.m270.l1313">Buy buy buy</a>!</p>
<h5>Price: £27.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="product">
<h4>Pocket Wizard Plus II Set</h4>
<p>                        <img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/budget_strobist/pw.jpg"></p>
<p>These are the big boys when it comes to firing flashes remotely, honestly I couldn&#8217;t bear to part with this sort of cash for this type of product. They just aren&#8217;t exciting enough. But if you are really feeling flush with cash you can get them <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pocket-wizard-plus-ii-set/p1014942">here</a>.</p>
<h5>Price: £320.00</h5>
</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Totals</h2>
<div class="product">
<h4>Budget: £103.00</h4>
</p></div>
<div class="product">
<h4>Premium: £657.00</h4>
</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</li>
</ul>
<p>I am not saying that <em>premium products</em> are bad, I like them a lot, but there is a time and a place for them and making your first step into <em>off camera flash</em> photography is probably not the time or the place. £104 will get you a great setup to start experimenting with and it&#8217;ll also feel a lot less rapey than £657! </p>
<h2>Update: Softboxes</h2>
<p>Ok, so since I put this post live I have had a lot of questions about softboxes and what a good cheap softbox would be to get started. Honestly all the cheap softboxes I have used have been horrid, really terrible — fiddly to put up, fiddly to take down. The first portable/strobist softbox I have come across that I have really liked is the <a href="http://www.fjwestcott.com/products/product.cfm?itemnum=2334&#038;tbl=products&#038;head=speedlite">Westcott Apollo</a>, and I mean REALLY liked! This thing owns! So here I would recommend not going cheap but if you really want a softbox splash out a bit, you can pick them up for about £120 &amp; IMO they are well worth it. Also Westcott recently <a href="http://fjwestcott.com/blog/?p=1340">announced</a> that they have a new distribution partner in the UK, so that should make it even easier to get their products. </p>
<p>If you really cant bare to part with that sort of money you could grab some <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/3964452030/">umbrella boxes</a>, they don&#8217;t give you the control of a soft box but they do give you that nice diffused light. You can grab some nice big 43 inch ones on <a href="http://photography.shop.ebay.co.uk/i.html?_nkw=umbrella+box+43&#038;_sacat=625&#038;_dmpt=UK_Photography_StudioEquipment_RL&#038;_odkw=umbrella+box&#038;_osacat=625&#038;bkBtn=&#038;_trksid=p3286.m270.l1313">ebay</a> for £16-20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/strobist-startup-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Shoot: Lowkey Portrait</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-lowkey-portrait/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-lowkey-portrait/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How I Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long time coming right? Yeah, but it's here now so shush your mouth! I want to start fairly simple, something that anyone getting into the strobist side of photography could achieve with some pretty basic kit. Lowkey sprung to mind straight away &#8212; It's easy to do with a single light &#038; you can use just about any lens, especially since we don't need to take advantage of a wide (low) aperture for a shallow depth of field. Oh also &#8212; I've done a video of the whole thing. It's at the end of this post, it's very amateur but maybe it will help you out… if not you can at least laugh at me!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time coming right? Yeah, but it&#8217;s here now so shush your mouth! I want to start fairly simple, something that anyone getting into the strobist side of photography could achieve with some pretty basic kit. Lowkey sprung to mind straight away &mdash; It&#8217;s easy to do with a single light &#038; you can use just about any lens, especially since we don&#8217;t need to take advantage of a wide (low) aperture for a shallow depth of field. Oh also &mdash; I&#8217;ve done a video of the whole thing. It&#8217;s at the end of this post, it&#8217;s very amateur but maybe it will help you out… if not you can at least laugh at me!</p>
<div id="how_to_preview_equitment">
<div class="preview">
<h2>Final Image Preview</h2>
<p>		<img src=http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/how_i_shoot_lowkey/final_preview.jpg	</div>
<div class="equitment">
<h2>Equipment List</h2>
<ul>
<li class="camera">
<p>
					<strong>Camera:</strong> Canon 50D
				</p>
<p class="small">
					Any dSLR will be fine.
				</p>
</li>
<li class="lens">
<p>
					<strong>Lens:</strong> Canon 50mm F/1.4
				</p>
<p class="small">
					But we aren’t taking advantage of the wide aperture so any lens with a similar focal length will work, even your kit lens.
				</p>
</li>
<li class="flashes">
<p>
					<strong>Flashes:</strong> Canon 580ex
				</p>
<p class="small">
					Any flash that you can fire wirelessly will work.
				</p>
</li>
<li class="accessories">
<p>
					<strong>Accessories:</strong> 1 light stand, 1 light bracket, 1 umbrella &amp; a tripod.
				</p>
<p class="small">
					You don&#8217;t need a umbrella or any light modifier this shot could be done with a bare flash.
				</p>
</li>
</ul></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
<h2>A Bit Of Planning</h2>
<p>A bit of planning goes a long way! It&#8217;s always good to have a fair idea of what you want to achieve before you go out to do a shot, it&#8217;ll save you time when you are out in the wild. Sometimes I&#8217;ll even do child like drawings of the sort of thing I want to end up with, or very sketchy lighting diagrams, or even save similarly styled/lit shots to my iPhone so I can flick through them when I am out.</p>
<p>Also if possible grab a friend/spouse/co-worker/stranger in the street to pose for you, it&#8217;s a lot easier &#038; quicker than doing it as a self portrait.</p>
<h2>The Shoot</h2>
<p>The first thing you need to know about a Lowkey shot like this is it <strong>does not</strong> need to be done at night, in fact doing it at night is a hell of a lot harder… how do you focus on something you can&#8217;t see!? I&#8217;m not saying you can do it in brilliant sunshine, but as long as the sun is setting or you are indoors you should be fine.  I did this shoot at about 9:00pm &amp; shot at a narrower (higher number) aperture to cut out the ambient light which, in this case, was the sun.  </p>
<p>Finding a suitable location was easy for this one, I just needed somewhere with a bit of space. I could have found a giant car park with nothing in the backdrop, but I thought picking somewhere with walls behind my subject would give me a chance to talk a little bit about <em>light to subject to backdrop ratios</em> without going into the <abbr title="the intensity of light radiating from a point source is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source.">inverse square law</abbr>. </p>
<p class="center"><img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/how_i_shoot_lowkey/location_500.jpg"/></p>
<p>The first thing I like to do when I get to a location is set up my kit roughly how I think I am going to use it. Then I start framing up my shot but I am not thinking about the lighting from my strobes just yet.</p>
<p>The light I want to focus on first is ambient light, which I want to completely eliminate. This is the easy part. First thing I do is make sure my ISO is set as low as it will go, then I set my shutter speed to the very fastest it will go with the triggers I am using.  With my current triggers (RF-602&#8242;s) I can sync up to 1/200th of a second <em>(FYI unless you can sync really fast shutter speed <strong>will not</strong> effect the strength of your flash)</em>. The fast shutter speed does a great job of getting rid of a lot of the sun light.</p>
<p>Then it&#8217;s all down to the aperture, starting with my aperture as wide as it will go, I progressively narrow it until I cut out all of the ambient light.  This is where the histogram is particularly useful, if you aren&#8217;t familiar with histograms I recently did a small <a href="/histograms/">post explaining them</a>. Every time I narrow my aperture I check the histogram until it tells me that all the light from the photo is gone. Kinda exactly like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/how_i_shoot_lowkey/ambient_aperture.png"></p>
<p>The benefit of working like this is that you aren&#8217;t making your aperture any smaller than you absolutely have to, which means you won&#8217;t have to work your flash quite so hard. I started with my flash at 1/4 power for this shot, which left my subject a little underexposed &amp; my backdrop was getting some light. </p>
<p class="center"><img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/how_i_shoot_lowkey/first_flash.jpg"/></p>
<p>Boo! But don&#8217;t panic &mdash; this is pretty easy to fix. You have <strong>three</strong> options, the first &amp; easiest is to turn the flash up &amp; move the light out to the side of the subject so less light is pointing at the backdrop. Second, again turn your flash up &amp; move everything further away from the backdrop, your subject, your lights, your camera, all of it. Third &mdash; hold on I need a new paragraph for this&hellip;</p>
<p>Unfortunately it&#8217;s not always possible to move away from your backdrop or you don&#8217;t want your lights out on the side; lucky for us there is something else we can do. If you move the light closer to your subject, lets say half the distance, you can actually then bring the power down by two stops while retaining the same level of exposure on your subject. Because your light is on a lower power the amount that gets to the back drop will be dramatically reduced. In fact if you started off with your light, subject &amp; backdrop with even spacing in between them, your backdrop will be under exposed by about eight stops which should stop it from showing up all together! </p>
<p><em>If you aren&#8217;t getting it don&#8217;t worry, the best thing to do is just get out &amp; try it out, it&#8217;s much easier to learn when you can see the results first hand. I&#8217;m also going to do a post about this sort of stuff soon to try &amp; break it down a little more, do some funky diagrams, you know &mdash; all that good stuff.</em></p>
<p class="center"><img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/how_i_shoot_lowkey/setup_500.jpg"/></p>
<p>After a little setup tweaking &amp; turning my flash up to 1/2 power, I got exactly the sort of light I was looking for. I used an umbrella box for my light modifier on this shoot because I like the softness that comes with it. But you could have used a snoot for a bit more control or even done it with a bare flash. From that point I just rattled off a whole bunch of shots, getting Mikee to pull some shapes for me &mdash; what a pro. So this is my final image, which has had pretty much zero editing done to it, just a crop &amp; tiny bit of desaturation.</p>
<p class="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4639506199/" title="How I Shoot: Lowkey Portrat"><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/how_i_shoot_lowkey/final_500.jpg" alt="How I Shoot: Lowkey Portrat" /></a></p>
<p>You can check this shot out on my <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4639506199/">Flickr</a> where you&#8217;ll be able to check out the large version &amp; see all the EXIF data… if that&#8217;s your kinda thing.</p>
<h2>The Video</h2>
<p>Yep… video&#8217;d the whole thing! I thought it might be helpful. Errr please note &mdash; this is the first time I have ever done anything like this, so it&#8217;s a little on the amateur side &#038; the audio is a little quiet in places &mdash; sorry.</p>
<p><object width="635" height="357"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=12014616&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=12014616&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="635" height="357"></embed></object></p>
<h2>The End</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;ve read all of this, thanks! It&#8217;s kinda long but I hope it&#8217;s helpful to at least a few people. Also if you&#8217;ve had a go at this, I&#8217;d love to hear about it. In fact it would be really awesome if you could post a link or preview of the photo in the comments!</p>
<p class="note"><a href="http://twitter.com/ricknunn">Follow me</a> on twitter to hear about my next post, which hopefully will explain <strong>stops</strong> in a clear &amp; concise way.</p>
<p class="note">I have made a <a href="http://flickr.com/groups/1464593@N22/">Flickr Group</a> so it&#8217;d be rad if anyone trying out this technique could add their photo to it. Or just join it to see what other people add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-lowkey-portrait/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Histograms</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/histograms/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/histograms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 08:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How I Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might already know all about histograms, if don't it's well worth getting your head around them because, well, they are pretty awesome. Unfortunately they are often overlooked, dismissed or misunderstood but they are very helpful especially when it comes to strobist photography.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might already know all about histograms, if you don&#8217;t it&#8217;s well worth getting your head around them because, well, they are pretty awesome. Unfortunately they are often overlooked, dismissed or misunderstood but they are very helpful especially when it comes to strobist photography.</p>
<p>A lot of people will tell you that a good photograph must have a nice even histogram, this is a blatant lie &#038; you must immediately set fire to who ever told you that. What you should do is think of a histogram as a light meter for after you&#8217;ve taken the shot &mdash; a light meter on a cocaine fuelled acid trip with a dab of heroine and a touch of speed.</p>
<p><strong>Anatomy of a histogram</strong> &mdash; from left to right the histogram will tell you about the dark, mid &amp; light content in your photo, and from top to bottom it will tell you how many pixels in your image are affected in that area.</p>
<p><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/histograms/histogram_main.png"></p>
<p>When I review a photo, I am probably more interested in what the histogram tells me than what the image preview is trying to show me. I am not looking for a good or bad histogram, there is no such thing, I am looking for one that matches the style of photo I am going for. So I have put together a few examples of histogram shapes and the type of photos they might match up with. </p>
<p><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/histograms/histograms.png"></p>
<p>So the next time you go out with your camera, try checking your histogram out after you&#8217;ve taken shot, hopefully it will give you a little more insight into how your photo has been exposed.</p>
<p>To get to your histogram on most Canon cameras you press the <strong>Info</strong> or <strong>Display</strong> button &#038; on most Nikon cameras you press the <strong>up</strong> or <strong>down</strong> button when previewing an image to cycle through the different views. </p>
<p class="note">Stay tuned for my next post <strong>&#8220;How I Shoot: A Lowkey Portrait&#8221;</strong> due out on the 26th May 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/histograms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Shoot: A Series</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-a-series/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-a-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How I Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanna start off by saying I am lame, yep, really. Lame! All the way back in January of this year I wrote a post titled &#8220;How I Shoot, Part 1 ~ The Tools&#8221; with a view of doing two further posts; Part 2 ~ The Shoot &#38; Part 3 ~ The Processing shortly after. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanna start off by saying <strong>I am lame</strong>, yep, really. <strong>Lame!</strong> All the way back in January of this year I wrote a post titled &#8220;<a href="/how-i-shoot-part-1-the-tools/">How I Shoot, Part 1 ~ The Tools</a>&#8221; with a view of doing two further posts; <strong>Part 2 ~ The Shoot</strong> &amp; <strong>Part 3 ~ The Processing</strong> shortly after. For the past eight to ten weeks I have been trying to put together the sequel. To date I have deleted no less than six drafts of it, it&#8217;s just not been working. I realised today that I am trying to fit way too much into it, making it way too long &#038; too much to take in, so I need to split into slightly more digestible chunks. </p>
<p>So the <strong>new</strong> plan is to do several posts, a series if you will, each featuring a different style of portrait, all using off camera flash. I want to start simple so the first of these posts will be a one light portrait onto a perfect black background &mdash; not dissimilar to this one:</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4014364239/" title="#288 ~ Vacant by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2551/4014364239_4a797867b3.jpg" width="500" height="500" alt="#288 ~ Vacant" /></a>
</p>
<p>After the first post I will then continue to cover other styles like: low depth of field street portraits at night (my favourite kind!), crisp portraits on white, day time shots balanced with a flash &mdash; stuff like these: </p>
<p class="center no_hover">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4571247922/" title="^_^ by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4040/4571247922_abf46cdce0_s.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="^_^" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4414143369/" title="Self #7 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2742/4414143369_51f2f04a67_s.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Self #7" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/3586379731/" title="#152 ~ Leah by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3348/3586379731_5b8eb445ba_s.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="#152 ~ Leah" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4019722516/" title="Autumn by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2661/4019722516_c627cd7148_s.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Autumn" /></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4297370391/" title="Messy Hair Is Good by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2792/4297370391_2910b90d00_s.jpg" width="75" height="75" alt="Messy Hair Is Good" /></a>
</p>
<p>I plan to publish the first post on the <strong>26th of May</strong>, a few <abbr title="Shout and scream at me!"><em>gentle</em></abbr> nudges over the next 2 weeks would be appreciated. So how does the new plan sound? Is there anything specifically people would like to see that I haven&#8217;t mentioned already? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-a-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo Post: Spring</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/spring/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/spring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the bits of nice weather we have been having lately I wanted to get some spring style shots so on Saturday, when the sun was shining, Kym &#38; I hopped into the car and headed off to some near by woods. I've put a few of these shots up on my flickr already but I wanted to share a few more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the bits of nice weather we have been having lately I wanted to get some spring style shots so on Saturday, when the sun was shining, <a href="http://twitter.com/kymellis">Kym</a> &amp; I hopped into the car and headed off to some near by woods. I&#8217;ve put a few of these shots up on my <a href="http://flickr.com/ricknunn">flickr</a> already but I wanted to share a few more: </p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4467748912/"><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/spring/spring_1.jpg"></a>
</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4469379439/"><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/spring/spring_2.jpg"></a>
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/spring/spring_3.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/spring/spring_4.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/spring/spring_5.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/spring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Week Of Self</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/week-of-self/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/week-of-self/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I embarked on my 2nd week of self project and completed the first, albeit small, project of the year. The project, if you hadn't guessed, was a week of self portraits, that sounds easy but it really isn't. I did it along side Kym, Leah &#038; Nat, three great girls. You should take some time to go and check out their shots, but before your wander off, take a look at what I came up with for the week. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I embarked on my 2nd week of self project and completed the first, albeit small, project of the year. The project, if you hadn&#8217;t guessed, was a week of self portraits, that sounds easy but it really isn&#8217;t.  I did it along side <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/kymellis/sets/72157623422921493/">Kym</a>, <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/leah-williams/">Leah</a> &#038; <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/8647427@N03/sets/72157623535748464/">Nat</a>, three great girls. You should take some time to go and check out their shots, but before your wander off, take a look at what I came up with for the week. </p>
<h4>&#8220;Sometimes I stay up so late that I have my morning coffee before I go to bed.&#8221;</h4>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4399103883/" title="Self #1 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4044/4399103883_eefd68084c.jpg" width="500" height="423" alt="Self #1" /></a>
</p>
<h4>&quot;If you wish to travel far and fast, travel light.&quot;</h4>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4401752807/" title="Self #2 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2785/4401752807_7b8b0e274b.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Self #2" /></a></p>
<p><h4>“No matter how far you have gone on the wrong road, turn back”</h4>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4405103420/" title="Self #3 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4021/4405103420_e90589dd3a.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Self #3" /></a></p>
<p><h4>&#8220;A human being is only breath and shadow.&#8221;</h4>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4406737353/" title="Self #4 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2783/4406737353_e0debecc30.jpg" width="500" height="500" alt="Self #4" /></a></p>
<p><h4>&quot;Shoot the kids and drown the neighbours! We&#8217;ve got a winner!&quot;</h4>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4409718226/" title="Self #5 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2706/4409718226_844e1ba7a1.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Self #5" /></a></p>
<p><h4>&quot;Tempers are wearing thin. Let&#8217;s hope some robot doesn&#8217;t kill everybody.&quot;</h4>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4414143369/" title="Self #7 by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2742/4414143369_51f2f04a67.jpg" width="500" height="417" alt="Self #7" /></a></p>
<p><p class="note">P.S. I know I haven&#8217;t been blogging as much as I should have been but I am back on it now! Promise! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/week-of-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delta</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/delta/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/delta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of December I was in London for the weekend, on the Sunday I put most of a roll of Ilford Delta ISO3200 through my Canon AE-1. I went to get the film processed as soon as I got back, but the labs I went to told me that they would have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of December I was in London for the weekend, on the Sunday I put most of a roll of <strong>Ilford Delta ISO3200</strong> through my <strong>Canon AE-1</strong>.</p>
<p>I went to get the film processed as soon as I got back, but the labs I went to told me that they would have to be sent away &amp; because of Christmas there would be a long wait. So I waited till post Christmas &amp; took it into the Lincoln branch of Jessops. I thought taking it in after would minimise the delay &amp; reduce the chance of them losing the film (Paranoid).</p>
<p>I kinda wish I hadn&#8217;t taken it to Jessops &#8211; it took them over 3 weeks to process it, they didn&#8217;t have a clue where my film was at any point and the staff were unhelpful when I was trying to get them to chase it for me. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say the development process of Delta 3200 has put me off shooting it for a while, back to the Fuji Xtra 400. I think I am so used to the speed and convenience of digital that if I can&#8217;t get a film developed &amp; onto my computer within a day I can&#8217;t stand it! I think I am mumbling now, just check out the photos, let me know what you think: </p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4312108155/" title="Leicester Square Tube Station by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4041/4312108155_ea577a13d8.jpg" width="500" height="334" alt="Leicester Square Tube Station" /></a>
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/delta_kym_underground.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/delta_china_town.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/delta_coffee_and_ice_cream.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/delta_flasher.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/delta_jack.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<img class="framed" src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/delta_cody.jpg">
</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4328118181/" title="Apple by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4051/4328118181_b8aaf8cc8b.jpg" width="500" height="334" alt="Apple" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/delta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/canon-ef-135mm-f2-l-usm/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/canon-ef-135mm-f2-l-usm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before we start let me warn you this isn't going to be an unbiased review, I will not be being objective, <strong>I am here to declare my love for this lens</strong>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we start let me warn you this isn&#8217;t going to be an unbiased review, I will not be being objective, <strong>I am here to declare my love for this lens</strong>.</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4300241274/" title="Self by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4300241274_9b7ea763b3.jpg" width="500" height="500" alt="Self" /></a>
</p>
<p>It took some doing to convince myself to part with the amount of cash that an <strong>L</strong> series lens costs. I was eyeing up the 100mm f/2 USM (not the f/2.8 macro) and I probably would have been happy with that lens if I hadn&#8217;t tried out some <strong>L</strong> series glass in <abbr title="London Camera Exchange">LCE</abbr>. After that I knew I wouldn&#8217;t be settling for anything less.</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4291250387/" title="Kym Through The 135mm F2.0 L by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4043/4291250387_0cc4b77243.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Kym Through The 135mm F2.0 L" /></a>
</p>
<p>I am SO glad I did make that jump, the Canon EF 135mm f/2 USM is an exceptionally sharp lens, I thought my <a href="/50mm-f1-4/">50mm f/1.4 USM</a> was sharp, but it is blown away by this. Even wide open at F/2 it just blows my mind with the level of detail it picks up and the depth of field gets silly small. I took the shot below at f/4 and uploaded the full size image to show off the detail picked up, you should definatly check out the face area, you can see the texture in the paint, every speck of dust, all of it! Take note that this image is 2922px x 4386px and about 2mb eek, still go <a href="http://ricknunn.com/s/4 ">look at it</a>.</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4304767108/" title="Gel'd Fortress by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4031/4304767108_8e335d65f6.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="Gel'd Fortress" /></a>
</p>
<p>This lens suites my style of shooting so well, if you have ever ventured onto my <a href="http://flickr.com/ricknunn">flickr</a> you&#8217;ll have seen low <abbr title="">DOF</abbr> portraits with a healthy helping of bokeh, this lens is already helping me take that to the next level. I&#8217;ve only had it week but it has quite possibly ruined me for all other lenses. <strong>Telephoto Primes Rock My Socks!</strong> </p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4297370391/" title="Messy Hair Is Good by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2792/4297370391_2910b90d00.jpg" width="500" height="228" alt="Messy Hair Is Good" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/canon-ef-135mm-f2-l-usm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Shoot: The Tools</title>
		<link>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-part-1-the-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-part-1-the-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How I Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strobist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricknunn.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get asked quite a lot about how I work with off camera flash. I thought it would be great to do a short series of posts that I can direct people to instead of replying to each one. In this first post I want to cover the tools I use, the second will cover setting up the lights &#038; taking the shot &#038; for the third I will cover post production.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get asked quite a lot about how I work with off camera flash when I produce images such as the one below. I thought it would be great to do a short series of posts that I can direct people to instead of replying to each one. In this first post I want to cover the tools I use, the second will cover setting up the lights &#038; taking the shot &#038; for the third I will cover post production.</p>
<p class="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4237557968/" title="Kym In The Snow *Explored* by Rick Nunn, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2787/4237557968_c67fe99a97.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Kym In The Snow *Explored*" /></a>
</p>
<h3>My Tools</h3>
<p><img src="http://resources.ricknunn.com/images/strobist_tools.png"></p>
<p>So these are the core tools that I have in my bag when I go out to do these sort of shots. I found it really hard to know what bits to pick up when I was getting into off camera flash photography so I wanna explain some of the options you have.</p>
<h3>Lights</h3>
<p>Aside from the camera arguably the most important part of the strobists tool kit. There are loads of options here depending on budget. I use the Canon 430ex, other options are the Canon 580ex, Nikon SB-900  Nikon SB-600, Nikon SB-24… the list goes on. Vivitar &#038; Sunpak make some cheaper flash units that might be investigating if you are on a tight budget but you do get what you pay for. The key things you are looking for is that the power can be adjusted, you don&#8217;t need to worry about a flashes automatic capabilities, unless you are willing to part with some serious cash for the new Pocket Wizard ControlTL triggers, I shoot with all my flashes on full manual. </p>
<h3>Triggers &#038; Receivers</h3>
<p>So really good triggers are really expensive, the real industry leaders here are Pocket Wizard &#8211; they are reliable &#038; have an insane range. But they aren&#8217;t for me. I just can&#8217;t justify spending the amount of money on them that I would need to. A <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pocket-wizard-plus-ii-set/p1014942">set of two</a> go for £320 and you need one per flash and one for the camera, that would put me out £640 for me to run my current set up! I can&#8217;t justify that. I currently use the very cheap but popular PT-04 triggers, you can pick the newly designed ones up from <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Channel-Wireless-Trigger-Control-Remote/dp/B002G95FXA/ref=pd_cp_ce_3">amazon</a> around £20 for a trigger &#038; receiver kit. They do misfire some times &#038; the range is no where near as good as the PWs but for the price they are great. </p>
<p>I have recently been looking at the <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-seculine-twinlink-t2d-transmitter-and-receiver-kit/p1033478#bvreviews">Seculine Twinlink T2D</a> kit, which seems to be something that fills the gap between the cheap triggers &#038; the expensive ones. I think some time in the near future I will be making the upgrade to these. </p>
<h3>Hotshoe With PC Port</h3>
<p>I don&#8217;t connect my flash directly to the receiver, I actually sit my flash into a hotshoe with a PC port on the side, I then velcro my receiver to the top of my flash &#038; run a cable. Mainly because I don&#8217;t trust the cheap plastic that the receivers are made from, I have already lost one flashgun because of it falling off a light stand, I don&#8217;t want to lose any more thank you very much. The hotshoes I have are made of metal and hardened plastic they also have a locking nut on them which means I can get them really tight on the light &#038; umbrella bracket. They aren&#8217;t going anywhere! Mine are pretty similar to <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/HOT-SHOE-MULTI-PC-SYNC-FLASH-ADAPTER-FITS-NIKON-CANON_W0QQitemZ260538077626QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_CamerasPhoto_CameraAccessories_CameraCablesConnectors?hash=item3ca94791ba#ht_4250wt_941">these</a> bad boys but I sure as hell didn&#8217;t pay £10 each for them! I think they were around £2.50 each, totally worth it! </p>
<h3>Light &#038; Umbrella Bracket</h3>
<p>This one is pretty easy, there are a few on the market, they all the do the same thing really. I have <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Holder-Swivel-Bracket-Olympus-Flashgun/dp/B001C1WO5K/ref=pd_bxgy_ce_img_c">these</a> ones, they hold an umbrella &#038; a flash in place nicely but they do require that the flash, or hotshoe if you are using one, screw/lock in to be held securely in place.</p>
<h3>Light Stand</h3>
<p>Another straight forward one, you can&#8217;t really go wrong. As long as they go up to a decent height &#038; aren&#8217;t going to fall over you are safe. I use the Konig brand ones which are available from <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Photography-Light-professional-studio-photolamps/dp/B0011363NS/ref=pd_bxgy_ce_img_b">Amazon</a> for just under £12. But <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-interfit-cor751-air-damped-stand/p10031">there</a> are <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-lastolite-4-section-stand-with-plastic-collars-85cm-312cm-1158/p1030304">plenty</a> of <a href="http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-bowens-heavy-duty-light-stand/p1033054">other</a> options.</p>
<p class="note">Update: This evening I put together a diy light stand out of some old bits I found in my dads garage, you can check it out <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ricknunn/4288348503/">here</a>.</p>
<h3>Umbrellas</h3>
<p>Umbrellas get a little more complicated. Firstly the bigger the umbrella the more diffused the light will be. Secondly the bigger the umbrella  the more power you will need to put through it. When using speedlights a good guide size to go for is between 60-100cm. There are 2 main types, shoot through and reflective, I like to keep both handy they are pretty inexpensive so it can&#8217;t hurt to have a seclection.</p>
<p><strong>Shoot throughs</strong> are the white ones, you point the umbrella at the subject and pop. They also spill light everywhere though, so you don&#8217;t have quite as much control over the light, but it will spread it out better. <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Umbrella-Professional-Photographic-Translucent-reflector/dp/B001UAVE68/ref=pd_sim_ce_3">This</a> one would do a fine job.</p>
<p><em>Reflective</em> umbrellas are the black ones, you point the umbrella away from the subject and the flash into the umbrella. Then the flash fires into the umbrella and all the light shines out, these will still give you the same soft light as a shoot through, but you can control where it goes a bit better. Something like <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/STUDIO-Umbrella-Reflecting-Diffuser-reflector/dp/B001UANLT6/ref=pd_cp_ce_2">this</a> should do you.</p>
<p>Actually there is totally a third type, this is the kind I use pretty much all the time. I call them umbrella boxes, because they are sort of a softbox &#038; an umbrella all rolled up into one &#8211; seriously awesome. I picked mine up from <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/109cm-43-reflective-softbox-soft-box-photo-umbrella-UK_W0QQitemZ250561939030QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Photography_StudioEquipment_RL?hash=item3a56a7c656#ht_3405wt_1167">ebay</a> &#038; never looked back.</p>
<h3>Camera &#038; Lens</h3>
<p>Use what you&#8217;ve got… that&#8217;s all there is to it. Nikon, Canon, Sony &#8211; whatever, it really doesn&#8217;t matter. As long as you&#8217;ve got a hotshoe on the  top that you can get a trigger into then you are good to go. If you want to get a really dramatic bokeh effect though you are going to need a lens that hits the right sort of Fs! The lower the number the better the bokeh! Both Canon &#038; Nikon produce a lens dubbed the nifty fifty, these are 50mm prime lenses that go down to F1.8 &#038; retail for around £100. Really worth having in your camera bag.  </p>
<p><strong>Did you find this useful? Let me know by leaving a comment. Or maybe you use some different kit, I&#8217;d love to hear about it so get involved.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ricknunn.com/how-i-shoot-part-1-the-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
